<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Timothy Brook&#8217;s Collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.froginawell.net/china/2006/04/review-of-timothy-brooks-collaboration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2006/04/review-of-timothy-brooks-collaboration/</link>
	<description>The China History Group Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:35:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. M. Lawson</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2006/04/review-of-timothy-brooks-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>K. M. Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 02:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2006/04/review-of-timothy-brooks-collaboration/#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Professor Tsao,

Thanks for your comment, I would indeed welcome your suggestions (I&#039;ll email you a copy of this comment).  Re-reading it I see a number of missing words and awkward sentences which ought to be cleaned up and I would be willing to post an updated version of this.

As for publication, I&#039;m a bit reluctant to submit a &quot;review of a review&quot; as my first entry into the world of scholarship, even if it were considered worth publishing somewhere in some form.   It will continue to be available here online in this public form and I have no objections to it being distributed freely.  I appreciate the suggestion though and do realize the importance of more professional reviews in journals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Tsao,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment, I would indeed welcome your suggestions (I&#8217;ll email you a copy of this comment).  Re-reading it I see a number of missing words and awkward sentences which ought to be cleaned up and I would be willing to post an updated version of this.</p>
<p>As for publication, I&#8217;m a bit reluctant to submit a &#8220;review of a review&#8221; as my first entry into the world of scholarship, even if it were considered worth publishing somewhere in some form.   It will continue to be available here online in this public form and I have no objections to it being distributed freely.  I appreciate the suggestion though and do realize the importance of more professional reviews in journals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hsingyuan Tsao</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2006/04/review-of-timothy-brooks-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Hsingyuan Tsao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 04:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2006/04/review-of-timothy-brooks-collaboration/#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Dear K. M. Lawson ,


I enjoyed reading your review very much. May I make a suggestion: please revise a little bit and submit your review to a goodplace for publication. I want more people read your view of the book rather than being confined only by Glosser&#039;s review. 

If you like, I could send my suggestions for revising. 
Hsingyuan Tsao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear K. M. Lawson ,</p>
<p>I enjoyed reading your review very much. May I make a suggestion: please revise a little bit and submit your review to a goodplace for publication. I want more people read your view of the book rather than being confined only by Glosser&#8217;s review. </p>
<p>If you like, I could send my suggestions for revising.<br />
Hsingyuan Tsao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frog in a Well - The Japan History Group Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2006/04/review-of-timothy-brooks-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>Frog in a Well - The Japan History Group Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 08:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2006/04/review-of-timothy-brooks-collaboration/#comment-779</guid>
		<description>[...] Even scholars are sometimes prone to put blame before understanding, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that we should privilege this. On the other hand, I have the greatest respect for John Dower as a scholar, teacher and individual: if he agrees that these images need more context, I will respect that. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even scholars are sometimes prone to put blame before understanding, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that we should privilege this. On the other hand, I have the greatest respect for John Dower as a scholar, teacher and individual: if he agrees that these images need more context, I will respect that. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

