<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Chinese brand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/06/the-chinese-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/06/the-chinese-brand/</link>
	<description>The China History Group Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:35:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dresner</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/06/the-chinese-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-56043</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dresner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/06/the-chinese-brand/#comment-56043</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the fact that there&#039;s low-end goods in the mix. Bricks can be made poorly or they can be made well. Ipods can be made poorly, too: I&#039;ve been told that the electronics which are sold to and by Wal-mart are often second-quality, which is how the manufacturers meet the price pressures while still selling better quality stuff where the margin is worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the fact that there&#8217;s low-end goods in the mix. Bricks can be made poorly or they can be made well. Ipods can be made poorly, too: I&#8217;ve been told that the electronics which are sold to and by Wal-mart are often second-quality, which is how the manufacturers meet the price pressures while still selling better quality stuff where the margin is worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

