<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exporting Maoism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/exporting-maoism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/exporting-maoism/</link>
	<description>The China History Group Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:35:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dresner</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/exporting-maoism/comment-page-1/#comment-67066</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dresner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/exporting-maoism/#comment-67066</guid>
		<description>Well, nothing says Pramoedya has to follow in the footsteps of previous radicals: there&#039;s always a new synthesis somewhere between the cracks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, nothing says Pramoedya has to follow in the footsteps of previous radicals: there&#8217;s always a new synthesis somewhere between the cracks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Baumler</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/exporting-maoism/comment-page-1/#comment-66929</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Baumler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/exporting-maoism/#comment-66929</guid>
		<description>Yes, the &quot;solution&quot; is pretty conservative, but the attack on the traditional class system, marriage, and family is a lot more radical and traditionally leftist, or at least it sounds like it. Or maybe I am reading too much of Pramoedya&#039;s 60&#039;s statements about the role of literature in revolution into this book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the &#8220;solution&#8221; is pretty conservative, but the attack on the traditional class system, marriage, and family is a lot more radical and traditionally leftist, or at least it sounds like it. Or maybe I am reading too much of Pramoedya&#8217;s 60&#8242;s statements about the role of literature in revolution into this book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dresner</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/exporting-maoism/comment-page-1/#comment-66876</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dresner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/exporting-maoism/#comment-66876</guid>
		<description>It sounds like Pramoedya is following the localist/anarchist tradition of folks like Wendell Berry, more than any conventional leftist line. It also reminds me a bit of the agricultural/traditional nationalism of pre-war Japan, siting the locus of national character and anti-modernist solution in the village community model. 

It shares a critique of statism, capitalism and industrialism with the Left, but the solution is deeply conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like Pramoedya is following the localist/anarchist tradition of folks like Wendell Berry, more than any conventional leftist line. It also reminds me a bit of the agricultural/traditional nationalism of pre-war Japan, siting the locus of national character and anti-modernist solution in the village community model. </p>
<p>It shares a critique of statism, capitalism and industrialism with the Left, but the solution is deeply conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

