<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/salt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/salt/</link>
	<description>The China History Group Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:35:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dresner</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/salt/comment-page-1/#comment-67586</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dresner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/salt/#comment-67586</guid>
		<description>Alan,

I already use Soulstealers (also Struve&#039;s collection and Cohen&#039;s Boxer book), but the point about economic/commercial history is one that bothers me, in terms of my own teaching. I don&#039;t slight it, in my own mind, but my sources are fairly strongly focused on intellectual, political, social history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan,</p>
<p>I already use Soulstealers (also Struve&#8217;s collection and Cohen&#8217;s Boxer book), but the point about economic/commercial history is one that bothers me, in terms of my own teaching. I don&#8217;t slight it, in my own mind, but my sources are fairly strongly focused on intellectual, political, social history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane J. Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/salt/comment-page-1/#comment-67565</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane J. Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/salt/#comment-67565</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree, Zelin&#039;s is a fantastic book that should be read by everyone in the field.  Salt, as we all know, was one of the most important commodities in imperial China and has been partially covered by other China scholars, i.e. Man Bun Kwan&#039;s The Salt Merchants of Tianjin (2001) and S.A.M. Adshead&#039;s The Modernization of the Salt Industry (1970) (discussing the American-run Salt Gabelle in the Republican era). But Zelin&#039;s book, besides being the best of the three, has relevance beyond the industry itself as it details the evolution of innovative Chinese business practices providing a great model of business history that simultaneously disproves many of Alfred Chandler&#039;s arguments about general business history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree, Zelin&#8217;s is a fantastic book that should be read by everyone in the field.  Salt, as we all know, was one of the most important commodities in imperial China and has been partially covered by other China scholars, i.e. Man Bun Kwan&#8217;s The Salt Merchants of Tianjin (2001) and S.A.M. Adshead&#8217;s The Modernization of the Salt Industry (1970) (discussing the American-run Salt Gabelle in the Republican era). But Zelin&#8217;s book, besides being the best of the three, has relevance beyond the industry itself as it details the evolution of innovative Chinese business practices providing a great model of business history that simultaneously disproves many of Alfred Chandler&#8217;s arguments about general business history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Baumler</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/salt/comment-page-1/#comment-67551</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Baumler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/salt/#comment-67551</guid>
		<description>Johnathan, 
  
  Not sure it would work all that well for undergrads. It is a little complex, and seems to assume a lot of knowledge about the state of the field. I tend to use Soulstealers, for a pure Qing book but maybe one of the Manchu books would be better? Maybe I will do a post on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnathan, </p>
<p>  Not sure it would work all that well for undergrads. It is a little complex, and seems to assume a lot of knowledge about the state of the field. I tend to use Soulstealers, for a pure Qing book but maybe one of the Manchu books would be better? Maybe I will do a post on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dresner</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/salt/comment-page-1/#comment-67519</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dresner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/09/salt/#comment-67519</guid>
		<description>Is this book suitable for undergrads? I&#039;m in the middle of my Qing course now, but I&#039;m always looking for new stuff....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this book suitable for undergrads? I&#8217;m in the middle of my Qing course now, but I&#8217;m always looking for new stuff&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

