<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jackie Chan and Louis Cha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/11/jackie-chan-and-louis-cha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/11/jackie-chan-and-louis-cha/</link>
	<description>The China History Group Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:35:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sukhee Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/11/jackie-chan-and-louis-cha/comment-page-1/#comment-77769</link>
		<dc:creator>Sukhee Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/11/jackie-chan-and-louis-cha/#comment-77769</guid>
		<description>I see Alan&#039;s point and tend to agree with him. Though hardly believable to any sane mind, 
martial arts novel can be dangerous to a dictatorial regime which is almost always staffed by one-dimentional people who tend to see only black and white in everything in the world. In the early 1980s, 
Chun Doohwan regime in Korea actually banned one martial arts novel, 
&quot;Murim pacheonhwang 武林破天荒&quot;, written by a former seminary student because the novel tells 
a story of an upright local hero who rose up against a tyrannical leader of the jianghu 
and finally overthrew him. Wow. This was one disturbingly sad and equally funny, from our vantage point, 
aspect of Korean dictatorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Alan&#8217;s point and tend to agree with him. Though hardly believable to any sane mind,<br />
martial arts novel can be dangerous to a dictatorial regime which is almost always staffed by one-dimentional people who tend to see only black and white in everything in the world. In the early 1980s,<br />
Chun Doohwan regime in Korea actually banned one martial arts novel,<br />
&#8220;Murim pacheonhwang 武林破天荒&#8221;, written by a former seminary student because the novel tells<br />
a story of an upright local hero who rose up against a tyrannical leader of the jianghu<br />
and finally overthrew him. Wow. This was one disturbingly sad and equally funny, from our vantage point,<br />
aspect of Korean dictatorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/11/jackie-chan-and-louis-cha/comment-page-1/#comment-77429</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/11/jackie-chan-and-louis-cha/#comment-77429</guid>
		<description>&quot;What is Chinese culture? Some bits of what might be called Chinese culture were not perhaps things Beijing wanted to play up, such as the Confucian concept of government by a class of incorruptible officials chosen for their skill rather than their connections.&quot;

I don&#039;t know on which planet you are studying sinology. Every confucian dynasty has been trapped in the spider web of connections
from the very beginning. I would say the reason the government of then did not want to play up the whole Confucian thing more because
it did not like the whole concept of traditional Chinese state at all. Admittedly, the China of 1981 was very xenophobic and anti-
western, but in practice it was very western oriented and eurocentric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What is Chinese culture? Some bits of what might be called Chinese culture were not perhaps things Beijing wanted to play up, such as the Confucian concept of government by a class of incorruptible officials chosen for their skill rather than their connections.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know on which planet you are studying sinology. Every confucian dynasty has been trapped in the spider web of connections<br />
from the very beginning. I would say the reason the government of then did not want to play up the whole Confucian thing more because<br />
it did not like the whole concept of traditional Chinese state at all. Admittedly, the China of 1981 was very xenophobic and anti-<br />
western, but in practice it was very western oriented and eurocentric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Baumler</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/11/jackie-chan-and-louis-cha/comment-page-1/#comment-77370</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Baumler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/11/jackie-chan-and-louis-cha/#comment-77370</guid>
		<description>I did not know about that, but while it may be a critical point I don&#039;t think it is something likely to make Beijing unhappy. Quite the opposite, it fits him in with the official line from the PRC quite well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not know about that, but while it may be a critical point I don&#8217;t think it is something likely to make Beijing unhappy. Quite the opposite, it fits him in with the official line from the PRC quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hung Yu</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/11/jackie-chan-and-louis-cha/comment-page-1/#comment-77287</link>
		<dc:creator>Hung Yu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/china/2007/11/jackie-chan-and-louis-cha/#comment-77287</guid>
		<description>Not sure that I agree with you about Jackie Chan not being critical of 
anything. Many people in Taiwan will remember his comments about the 
2004 Presidential election being &#039;the biggest joke in the world&#039;.
There are real problems with Taiwan&#039;s democracy, but people from 
Hong Kong are not in the strongest position to point them out. 
Especially when done in such an ignorant fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure that I agree with you about Jackie Chan not being critical of<br />
anything. Many people in Taiwan will remember his comments about the<br />
2004 Presidential election being &#8216;the biggest joke in the world&#8217;.<br />
There are real problems with Taiwan&#8217;s democracy, but people from<br />
Hong Kong are not in the strongest position to point them out.<br />
Especially when done in such an ignorant fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

