<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Constitution for Japan?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.froginawell.net/japan/2004/11/a-new-constitution-for-japan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.froginawell.net/japan/2004/11/a-new-constitution-for-japan/</link>
	<description>The Japan History Group Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:08:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frog in a Well - The Japan History Group Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/japan/2004/11/a-new-constitution-for-japan/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Frog in a Well - The Japan History Group Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 09:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/japan/?p=23#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>[...] th national distribution in the works.  	The Constitutional revision question I wrote about here has expanded, apparently, to include the gender equity clauses, which are being blamed by social conse [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] th national distribution in the works.  	The Constitutional revision question I wrote about here has expanded, apparently, to include the gender equity clauses, which are being blamed by social conse [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frog in a Well - The Japan History Group Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.froginawell.net/japan/2004/11/a-new-constitution-for-japan/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Frog in a Well - The Japan History Group Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froginawell.net/japan/?p=23#comment-773</guid>
		<description>[...]  it harder for China to maintain its traditional rejection of Japanese power. Article IX is still a sticky point: maintaining it makes it easier for Japan&#8217;s former and present competitors to de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  it harder for China to maintain its traditional rejection of Japanese power. Article IX is still a sticky point: maintaining it makes it easier for Japan&#8217;s former and present competitors to de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
