Thanks for the reply. I would like to correspond with you more but perhaps we should do it directly. If you go on to the Univ. of Oregon homepage and click on directory and enter my name you’ll get my contact info. I tried doing the same on the Harvard site but apparently you guys are more concerned about privacy than us Ducks.

Cheers,
Ethan

It’s great to meet a fellow historian, Oregonian, and martial arts aficionado! Too bad it has to come like this, but hopefully we can find a way to share the topic without butting heads. I wonder: how developed is your project? It would be too bad if we’ve been plugging away at this separately for too long. Unfortunately, yours and my interpretations would have to differ radically for us to cover exactly the same ground, and it’s probably not wise to begin your career by arguing with colleagues.

As for unique directions, I think you are right to look for different things going on in Okinawa versus the “naichi”. My study mentions this without really going into it; my focus is on the adaptations of Funakoshi and other karate practitioners who relocated to Tokyo. The counter-adoption of Japanized karate by Okinawans could bear fruit, although since most karate publishing has been from Tokyo, it would require more resourcefulness than I have shown. Dennis Frost, also a member of this blog, is working on modern sports in the Meiji and Taisho periods with an emphasis on Okinawa. He is a good resource and a great guy. You might ask him about Okinawan archives. If you are interested in international history, Hawai’ian and other diaspora populations were important in the modernization of karate. Also, while much interesting work has been done on sumo and judo, other arts like kendō, iaidō, aikidō, and Shorinji Kempo have received less attention. Incidentally, these all modernized at different times, and more could be done on the changing meanings and methods of modernization in the different contexts of Meiji, Taisho, and postwar Showa.

But maybe this is the wrong tack. I can only really think of things that I want to do, of my own take on things. Maybe I should be asking for your insights instead. With that in mind, I’m positing the first few pages of the introduction to a work in progress, which outline the directions I will be pursuing. If you see enough room for your project, or just want to discuss it further, I’d love to hear your thoughts.

My name is Ethan Savage and I am a graduate student in Asian Studies
at the University of Oregon. I am working on a project on karate as an
invented tradition (sound familiar?). Long story short, I was concerned
that trends in early Meiji on the mainland were not necessarily the same
in Okinawa. My advisor, Jeff Hanes, said that he would contact his
ex-wife Linda Angst and see if she had any insights. Well, obviously
that is how your name came up. I must admit it was a bit like a
mawashi geri to the gedan area when I found out that you had done the
same thing. Then I thought, well maybe I’ll concentrate on this idea of
dō a bit more to take my own path so to speak. Of course I then
stumbled on to your blog and was once again feeling a bit redundant.
At any rate I guess I am writing to find a little more out about your
project and see if you have any advice/insights that might help to send
me in a direction of my own.

Cheers.