Comments on: Who Owns Koguryo Now?

By: kana

kana — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:04:31 +0000

Goguryeo was originally the northern Korean part and southern Manchuria. They got more of that Man
churian land by conquest and history states that it was a Korean Kingdom. Even ancient Chinese
texts stated that it was the dongyi which means eastern bowmen/barbarians and the three Kingdoms
of Korea. The Chinese also stated that it’s culture and customs were the same with that of Baekje
and Shilla. Shilla among the three having less Chinese borrowment because of it’s geography. That
should actually clench it. For the Balhae part, they stated that they were the succesor state to Go
guryeo and at times called itself Goryeo guk which means Goyeo state. They also had the ondol tech
nology which was passed down all the way from Korea’s first state Gojoseon, something of a great
distinction to the Chinese and not used my the Malgal, Jurchens, or the Chinese. I think that Chin
ese scholars can be quite oppurtunistic. Also stupid: they said Goguryeo was their history and then
started the Northeastasia project. I wonder how other people are gonna think. Anti Koreans especial
ly

By: Jonathan Dresner

Jonathan Dresner — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 09:29:24 +0000

Oh, well, if you say so….

Seriously, though, if you think for a minute that Chinese scholars don’t share “far too strong nationalism” then you need to reconsider. Koguryo’s territory spanned the modern border on both sides by a long shot, and neither ethnicity nor culture are “owned” or clear enough to establish paternity, so to speak.

By: bruker

bruker — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:07:40 +0000

china Owns Koguryo , korean scholars always display their far too strong nationalism not

in just this Koguryo issue . they should have show more professionalism

By: Owen

Owen — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:50:27 +0000

I’m planning a fairly in-depth post on this soon, looking at some less nationalist views of Koguryŏ history from Korean scholars. Looks like I’ll have to incorporate Ahn’s article too…